Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

[foxy6800]

Was wondering what are the advantages of using the Emulators
Can people who have been using it, share their views please

thanks

[bokkie]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

Mgcamd has a cache buffer, so can be less glitchy than cccam.

[besit]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

MGCamd is an ideal solution to use with newcamd protocol.
To work with CCCam protocol better use CCCam emulator.
But if you want to get more features from your emu software like working with real cards, wireless probes, old tuners without ethernet etc install something like OSCAM, MCas or WICARDD.

[kalpikos]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

All depends on the server that give you the line.
There some servers that can work better with mgcamd , but some others can work with less freezing and glitching on cccam, because the line is not for use in this cam.

As already @bokkie said, mgcamd use cache buffer and usually the users can get better results than cccam.
For me, mgcamd is by far the best cam.

[KVF1966]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

you yourself can determine what emulator works better. for this you need to upload several different emulators and including one of the emulators check your line. for me preferably MGcamd

[foxy6800]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

Thanks guys
So for example if I install Mgcamd, can I put the Cline from satlover in it and get a better result than using CCcam?

thanks

[gianni253]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

Thanks guys
So for example if I install Mgcamd, can I put the Cline from satlover in it and get a better result than using CCcam?

thanks

Some users report that mgcamd can give better results, but it not so simple to take definitive conclusions when clines can be used from other users in a few seconds and server load can vary from one moment to another ...

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

For me cccam is more simple to use/configure but you can give mgcamd a try. With mgcamd you don't have access to web interface like in cccam. You can read more in this topic

regards

[foxy6800]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

so basically I have to try and find out which one works best for me
I would agree that CCcam probably is simpler to work with
Thank you "BlueIsMyColor" , I will have a read and see what I can do.

Thanks again guys for helping

[crusedos]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

If you are connected to cccam server with high ecm time, can I reduce the high ecm
time with this cache configuration on mgcam client?

Thanks all.

# network ecm timeout in seconds
K: { 01 }

# keep ecm cache, seconds
# every cache entry takes 28 bytes, so 24h cache will take *only* 240-400kb of memory,
# for openbox/elanvision users with remote shares make sense to set it higher than default value,
# to not hammer cards while timeshifting or playing crypted recordings.
E: { 3600 }

# cache option, summ of:
# 00 Off (default)
# 01 Ecm pids cache, store pids used to decode in /tmp/ca_cache.list at exit, load at startup, same syntax as restore.list
# 02 Ecm data cache, remember CW for (E time
# 04 Emm cache for network cards, do not resend the same emm twice, cache not cleared until restart
H: { 07 }

[aplok]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

hello

in a closed threat, an interesting point is revealed by kalpikos about mgcam vs cccam

http://www.sl-forums.com/forum/314743-post18.html

You are right about the mgcamd and some channels that can be cleared instead of cccam that are black.

is there anybody can share us this experience ?
and some channel example this is the case

thx

[mahrkpat]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

I experiment with different images and create back up images and always have included
mgcamd as an option and this just my personal experience but what I have found is this
c lines work well in cccam and oscam but sometimes not so well in mgcamd but where
mgcamd is better than cccam and oscam is when using n lines this is where the ecm
caching comes into play and freezing and glitching is reduced.

[kalpikos]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

is there anybody can share us this experience ?
and some channel example this is the case

I know a packet that can be open only with mgcamd

The B*lsatcom on 39E

They use b*lcrypt encryption for their channels.
The cccam can't recognize this type of encryption and all the channels are black.
If you switch to mgcamd all channels can be opened.

...but where mgcamd is better than cccam and oscam is when using n lines this is where the ecm caching comes into play and freezing and glitching is reduced.

You are right my friend

N lines are working perfect with mgcamd.
Caching is a major factor for that and it's something that cccam can't do

[besit]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

N lines are working perfect with mgcamd.
Caching is a major factor for that and it's something that cccam can't do

That's because mgcamd is made for newcamd and also can somehow handle other protocols
I never succeeded setting up mgcamd for work with c-line.
Russian CS payservers use newcamd and recommend to use mgcamd for it's simplest in setting up for newcamd.
There's another softcam popular in Russia - Wicard which works perfect with newcamd
According to my experience the best multiprotocol softcam is OSCAM

[kalpikos]

Re: Advantages of using Mgcamd?!

...I never succeeded setting up mgcamd for work with c-line.

come on

It's not so difficult

The only you have to do is to put the C-line that you have in cccamd.list which is in the folder var/keys and also change the value G to G: { 33 } in mg_cfg.

Try it and you will see that it's working

If you still have problem , try other version of mgcamd.