Welcome!

Welcome to Satlover forums, full of great people, ideas and excitement.

Please register if you would like to take part. link..

Register Now

Alert: Don't Use Hotmail Email Accounts for registration

Collapse

Before Access to all Forums and Trial accounts you must need to activate your account Email address

Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • arturor
    Newbie
    • Oct 2012
    • 3

    Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

    Hello guys. As title says, is mgcamd better than cccam? Which are the pros and cons?
  • bokkie
    Experienced Board Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 1561

    #2
    Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

    Some say that mgcamd is faster zapping than cccam and has lower ecm.
    I personally haven't tried it as my server doesn't allow it, but many people prefer it.
    remember it is client only.

    Comment

    • herrr
      Experienced Board Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 1081

      #3
      Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

      Originally posted by bokkie
      Some say that mgcamd is faster zapping than cccam and has lower ecm.
      I personally haven't tried it as my server doesn't allow it, but many people prefer it.
      remember it is client only.
      I didn't try it by myself, but I read interesting things about emu with keys.
      I think it maked it possible some EMU, like TNT, before new version of CCcam did.

      Comment

      • digicon
        Experienced Board Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 971

        #4
        Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

        Originally posted by bokkie
        Some say that mgcamd is faster zapping than cccam and has lower ecm.
        I personally haven't tried it as my server doesn't allow it, but many people prefer it.
        remember it is client only.

        I am not sure what you exactly mean by that 'Client Only' as mgcamd can be used by either and can also handle Multiple servers through 1 line.

        The main reason why its used is that it stores CW's in cache so if say a server has a blip you wont notice in as much in mgcamd through an 'N' line as much as what you would using a 'C' line in CCcam, thats the main reason most payservers use them

        Comment

        • microchick
          Experienced Board Member
          • Apr 2012
          • 1162

          #5
          Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

          All depends on your receiver. If you have a linux receiver then c line or any line is better but for other cheapos they provide n line. Most of the servers would want to know what receiver do you use before you subscribe.
          If you like my post, please don't hesitate to click on "Thanks"button. Thank you

          Comment

          • marian321
            Banned
            • Sep 2012
            • 160

            #6
            Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

            There's a little difference in the ecm-request and also a little difference in zapping speed. This depends on the server you are connected. If the server is too slow or overloaded, no cam can help.

            Comment

            • mahrkpat
              Experienced Board Member
              • Jun 2012
              • 1493

              #7
              Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

              When we compare mgcamd and cccam, while MGCamd allows the user and the card added with no reboot/restart/interruption, with CCcam, after each adding, this could be either a user or a card, the system should be restarted, and this means the loss of 15 to 20 seconds, whenever the mentioned execution is repeated.

              Some CCcam server owners themselves build or exchange with extra servers and give extra lines to prevent this loss of time, yet this is in my opinion, completely needless for a small procedure/operation. Besides, the card Exchange causes nothing but a heavy load and traffic upon cards resulting in frequent glitches/freezes by which the viewing plesure is significantly worsend.

              Contrary to CCcam, MgCamd uses the cache buffer. It means that when a channel is opened, the MGCamd server saves the channel key and when another user or users open the same channel/channels, MGCamd receives and uses that key data from buffer. This makes the server much faster because of the fact that it does not have to check the card twice for the key data again, so it allows a faster channel zapping and a much better tv experience.

              Mgcamd server does not stop without the human intrusion, meaning the interfearance of the server admin. Where as, the biggest problem of the CCCam server is the great likelyhood to stop randomly at any unpredictable time due to the massive amount of requests from the cards. Even commands scripted for the automatic reset in case the server stops, could not prevent the time loss described above.
              A quote don't know if accurate or not.
              Liked my post then push the sigpic button.

              Comment

              • marian321
                Banned
                • Sep 2012
                • 160

                #8
                Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

                Originally posted by mahrkpat

                Contrary to CCcam, MgCamd uses the cache buffer. It means that when a channel is opened, the MGCamd server saves the channel key and when another user or users open the same channel/channels, MGCamd receives and uses that key data from buffer. This makes the server much faster because of the fact that it does not have to check the card twice for the key data again, so it allows a faster channel zapping and a much better tv experience.
                This is the big advantage e.g. for football matches which means that the server can answer faster on many ecm-requests of the same program (if they can reach the server at the same time).

                Comment

                • cisko
                  Banned
                  • Sep 2012
                  • 237

                  #9
                  Re: Is mgcamd protocol better than cccamd

                  This is a server side advantage, also Oscam has it. The bigger advantage is, in my personal opinion, the better support of n-line, and the ability to use one n-line for more than one caid (obviously either client and server must run Mgcamd or equivalent software with that function enabled).

                  Comment

                  Working...