Differences between cccam-versions as server?

[Satphoenix]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

256 trick, ok, one reason. It's a simple cheat to hide the original card position.
But are there other performance differences?

[ocin]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The 256 trick will not work on any version of CCCam over 2.1.3

At least 2.0.11, I know.

[gianni253]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

Here some posts

... Now I recompiled a version so I could trigger the backdoor myself, and TADA, ...

It would be nice to know how this guy could "recompile" ...
It surely means he has the sources, but if he has the sources he knows EVERYTHING about ccc*am.
Sounds like a story ...

[aplok]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

i've found this:

Oscam--CCcam--trick 256

__http://www.satlover.eu/forum/dreambox-images-for-clones/27682-oscam-cccam-trick-256-a.html

[digicon]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The 256 trick will not work on any version of CCCam over 2.1.3

[gauloises1]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

the reason is to "connect" your oscam READER to cccam SERVER
ex:mycard is readed by oscam but i use cccam for server and clients ....
"trick" is used for this kind of things
you can use this trick to 2.011,2.13 and 2.14
2.011 is usually a oscam-cccam config(you can change this version in 2.13,2.14.....in oscam-configuration-cccam)

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

it's an old trick that you can add the number 256 to the end of N line and reshare a card as local many hops down.

So it's a way to fool the others?! But i don't think that's the only reason. There must be positive things to use one oldest version.

regards

[aplok]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

... and reshare a card as local many hops down.

... a trick or an illusion ? :

even if the hop counter is reset to 0,

this does not stop the ecm time response ... and further freezing ...

[kalpikos]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

hi,

what do you mean by the 256 trick ?

thx

it's an old trick that you can add the number 256 to the end of N line and reshare a card as local many hops down.

[aplok]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The CCcam 2.0.11 is the fastest one, and its possible to do the 256 trick!

hi,

what do you mean by the 256 trick ?

thx

[vuplusuno]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The great majority of the servers still using the 2.0.11 version. I don´t know why but there must be some reasons.

regards

The CCcam 2.0.11 is the fastest one, and its possible to do the 256 trick!

[peremacedonia]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

Here some posts

Hi here is a possible serious issue arising with cccam reported on certain forums plese read i have copied this of a certain forum it translated into english and original german text 


As some of you have noticed certainly support the CCcam is asleep. Since the beginning of this year, there were no new versions and more are coming, probably no more.
Much more than the programmers a new business idea, which makes them ordendlich pockets full.

All CCcam versions of version 1.6.1 have a backdoor, which allows the server port to poll data.
We obtain for example CCcam.cfg and the data of the local maps, without which one is enabled in the config. Also available to anyone who knows the IP and port.
The programmers have written for a tool that looks for specifying a dynamic IP or DNS address and the correct server listening port, a serial number of smart cards.
delivered after the server has the data, the CCcam.cfg the server is searched for additional addresses and these are stripped of their card serial numbers.
The results can be on screen with track and write to a file.
Sun serial number, IP and date are recorded with time.

For those who are wondering what the **** is, the well is clear that hereby can earn a lot of money.
The programmers provide the tool PayTV providers and providers of encryption systems to buy, so that they can actively seek Cardsharern who share their cards over the Internet without permission.

It is clear that this tool has already found buyers. Confirmed is that LOL

Hurrah again but thread on Zebradem. silver surfer you have written but I am well impressed. If so I'll send you out my DNSort by PM / M and you give me things my
Serial
Listen
Read phonetically
Dictionary - View detailed dictionary


Wie ihr ja sicherlich gemerkt habt, ist der Support der CCcam eingeschlafen. Seit Anfang dieses Jahres gab es keine neuen Versionen mehr und es werden wohl auch keine mehr kommen.
Viel mehr haben die Programmierer eine neue Geschäftsidee, welche ihnen ordendlich die Taschen voll macht.

Alle CCcam Versionen ab version 1.6.1 besitzen eine Backdoor, welche es erlaubt, über den Serverport, Daten abzufragen.
So erhält man z.b. die CCcam.cfg und auch Daten der lokalen Karten, ohne das man in der Config freigegeben ist. Also für jeden zugänglich, der IP und Port kennt.
Die Programmierer haben dafür ein Tool geschrieben, welches unter Angabe einer IP oder dynamischen DNS Adresse und des richtigen Server Listening Ports, nach Seriennummern von Smartcards sucht.
Nach dem der Server die Daten geliefert hat, wird die CCcam.cfg des Servers nach weiteren Adressen durchsucht und auch diese werden ihrer Kartenseriennummern beraubt.
Die Ergebnisse lassen sich auf dem Bildschirm mit verfolgen und in eine Datei schreiben.
So werden Seriennummer, IP und Datum mit Uhrzeit erfasst.

Wer sich jetzt fragt, was der Scheiß soll, dem wird wohl schnell klar, dass sich hiermit eine menge Geld verdienen lässt.
Die Programmierer bieten das Tool PayTV Providern und Anbietern von Verschlüsselungssystemen zum Kauf an, so dass diese aktiv nach Cardsharern suchen können, die unerlaubt ihre Karten übers Internet teilen.

Es steht fest, das dieses Tool schon Käufer gefunden hat. Bestätigt ist, dass LOL

Hurra wieder son Thread auf Zebradem. SilverSurfer hast du aber gut geschrieben bin beindruckt. Wenn das so ist schick ich dir mal meine DNSort per PN/M und du sachst mir meine
Serial

CCCAM 2.3.0 is taking the backdoor crap even a step further.

The lowest scum of the earth, UVADI TEAM, have done it even better this time. Making sure sharing will die for sure if they keep this crap up.

Before I continue, I would urge people with BRAINS and PROGRAMMING SKILLS, to download IDA PRO (torrent) and decompile it for themselfs to find the fucking remotely triggered backdoor.

How it works.

When you install CCcam 2.3.0 , nothing special is happening at first, and cccam will check for input activity on the pc or box to make sure nobody is watching. When it finds itself comfortably alone, it will start sending your ENTIRE CCCAM.CFG info to this IP 176.9.242.159 (a rented root server in germany).
Now I recompiled a version so I could trigger the backdoor myself, and TADA, some fucking ITALIAN dialup asswipe connected to the server I just set up , IP : 2.32.190.9. So traffic on my card started. THIS THEY CAN NOT HIDE in Cccam, it shows as a CONNECTED CLIENT from one of your clients in cccam.cfg where the dyndns has been removed (still lack of cccam, if dyndns is non-existing) the security feature doesn't work anymore and everybody can connect on that user.

I have 2 words for UVADI TEAM -> YOU SUCK !!!!!!

The future of CCcam is dead thanks to these low life asswipes , just after free sharing and making their own "spidernetwork" on your card.

BLOCK ALL CLIENTS that have 2.3.0 connected to your server as it will still read all connected clients from the server, trough the client !!

latest original CCcam 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 which are secure and don't have this backdoor code.

[aplok]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing

infox or intox ?

-> quote reference please ...

[SatWaveDude]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing

Is there any proof of this suspicion?

Please let us see log files of unwanted IP connections that cccam makes via it's so called backdoor.

Have you ever test this before you spread the news there is a backdoor in cccam?

[sjamesamuel]

Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing

Would you please elaborate on this?
Does this affect users too?