Welcome!

Welcome to Satlover forums, full of great people, ideas and excitement.

Please register if you would like to take part. link..

Register Now

Alert: Don't Use Hotmail Email Accounts for registration

Collapse

Before Access to all Forums and Trial accounts you must need to activate your account Email address

Differences between cccam-versions as server?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Satphoenix
    Experienced Board Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 999

    Differences between cccam-versions as server?

    Hello, a short question:

    What are the main difference between the cccam-versions as server?
    When I look into the cccam-webinterface I see different versions of cccam-servers, mainly 2.011, but some use 2.11 or 2.14.
    I haven't seen any server using 2.30 until now.

    What are the differences between these versions as server?
    If you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans!
  • aplok
    Experienced Board Member
    • Jun 2013
    • 1155

    #2
    Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

    this is the black box question of the site

    some hints here:

    __http://www.satlover.eu/forum/cccam/50309-cccam-contest-2-0-10-2-0-11-2-1-4-2-2-1-and-2-3-0-a.html

    Comment

    • BlueIsMyColor
      Experienced Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 363

      #3
      Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

      The great majority of the servers still using the 2.0.11 version. I don´t know why but there must be some reasons.

      regards

      Comment

      • peremacedonia
        Experienced Board Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 872

        #4
        Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

        The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing
        Rule n.33 kid..... Concentrate

        Comment

        • sjamesamuel
          Board Senior Member
          • Jul 2013
          • 251

          #5
          Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

          Originally posted by peremacedonia
          The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing
          Would you please elaborate on this?
          Does this affect users too?

          Comment

          • SatWaveDude
            Board Senior Member
            • Apr 2012
            • 220

            #6
            Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

            Originally posted by peremacedonia
            The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing
            Is there any proof of this suspicion?

            Please let us see log files of unwanted IP connections that cccam makes via it's so called backdoor.

            Have you ever test this before you spread the news there is a backdoor in cccam?
            SatWaveDude

            DM500HD, DM500+ | EMP S16/1PCP-W3 | WaveFrontier T90 | 16x SMART Titanium 0.1dB LNB's
            TechniSat SkyStar S2 PCI / SkyStar USB HD
            WaveFrontier T90 rev.2 - 28.2E | 23.5E | 19.2E | 16E | 13E | 10/9E | 3.3E | 4/5E | 0.8W | 7/8W | 12.5W

            If you find my post usefull please press the Thanks Button

            Comment

            • aplok
              Experienced Board Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 1155

              #7
              Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

              Originally posted by peremacedonia
              The versions after cccam 2.0.11 have backdor code to trace cardsharing
              infox or intox ?

              -> quote reference please ...

              Comment

              • peremacedonia
                Experienced Board Member
                • Jun 2010
                • 872

                #8
                Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                Here some posts
                Code:
                Hi here is a possible serious issue arising with cccam reported on certain forums plese read i have copied this of a certain forum it translated into english and original german text 
                
                
                As some of you have noticed certainly support the CCcam is asleep. Since the beginning of this year, there were no new versions and more are coming, probably no more.
                Much more than the programmers a new business idea, which makes them ordendlich pockets full.
                
                All CCcam versions of version 1.6.1 have a backdoor, which allows the server port to poll data.
                We obtain for example CCcam.cfg and the data of the local maps, without which one is enabled in the config. Also available to anyone who knows the IP and port.
                The programmers have written for a tool that looks for specifying a dynamic IP or DNS address and the correct server listening port, a serial number of smart cards.
                delivered after the server has the data, the CCcam.cfg the server is searched for additional addresses and these are stripped of their card serial numbers.
                The results can be on screen with track and write to a file.
                Sun serial number, IP and date are recorded with time.
                
                For those who are wondering what the **** is, the well is clear that hereby can earn a lot of money.
                The programmers provide the tool PayTV providers and providers of encryption systems to buy, so that they can actively seek Cardsharern who share their cards over the Internet without permission.
                
                It is clear that this tool has already found buyers. Confirmed is that LOL
                
                Hurrah again but thread on Zebradem. silver surfer you have written but I am well impressed. If so I'll send you out my DNSort by PM / M and you give me things my
                Serial
                Listen
                Read phonetically
                Dictionary - View detailed dictionary
                
                
                Wie ihr ja sicherlich gemerkt habt, ist der Support der CCcam eingeschlafen. Seit Anfang dieses Jahres gab es keine neuen Versionen mehr und es werden wohl auch keine mehr kommen.
                Viel mehr haben die Programmierer eine neue Geschäftsidee, welche ihnen ordendlich die Taschen voll macht.
                
                Alle CCcam Versionen ab version 1.6.1 besitzen eine Backdoor, welche es erlaubt, über den Serverport, Daten abzufragen.
                So erhält man z.b. die CCcam.cfg und auch Daten der lokalen Karten, ohne das man in der Config freigegeben ist. Also für jeden zugänglich, der IP und Port kennt.
                Die Programmierer haben dafür ein Tool geschrieben, welches unter Angabe einer IP oder dynamischen DNS Adresse und des richtigen Server Listening Ports, nach Seriennummern von Smartcards sucht.
                Nach dem der Server die Daten geliefert hat, wird die CCcam.cfg des Servers nach weiteren Adressen durchsucht und auch diese werden ihrer Kartenseriennummern beraubt.
                Die Ergebnisse lassen sich auf dem Bildschirm mit verfolgen und in eine Datei schreiben.
                So werden Seriennummer, IP und Datum mit Uhrzeit erfasst.
                
                Wer sich jetzt fragt, was der Scheiß soll, dem wird wohl schnell klar, dass sich hiermit eine menge Geld verdienen lässt.
                Die Programmierer bieten das Tool PayTV Providern und Anbietern von Verschlüsselungssystemen zum Kauf an, so dass diese aktiv nach Cardsharern suchen können, die unerlaubt ihre Karten übers Internet teilen.
                
                Es steht fest, das dieses Tool schon Käufer gefunden hat. Bestätigt ist, dass LOL
                
                Hurra wieder son Thread auf Zebradem. SilverSurfer hast du aber gut geschrieben bin beindruckt. Wenn das so ist schick ich dir mal meine DNSort per PN/M und du sachst mir meine
                Serial
                Code:
                CCCAM 2.3.0 is taking the backdoor crap even a step further.
                
                The lowest scum of the earth, UVADI TEAM, have done it even better this time. Making sure sharing will die for sure if they keep this crap up.
                
                Before I continue, I would urge people with BRAINS and PROGRAMMING SKILLS, to download IDA PRO (torrent) and decompile it for themselfs to find the fucking remotely triggered backdoor.
                
                How it works.
                
                When you install CCcam 2.3.0 , nothing special is happening at first, and cccam will check for input activity on the pc or box to make sure nobody is watching. When it finds itself comfortably alone, it will start sending your ENTIRE CCCAM.CFG info to this IP 176.9.242.159 (a rented root server in germany).
                Now I recompiled a version so I could trigger the backdoor myself, and TADA, some fucking ITALIAN dialup asswipe connected to the server I just set up , IP : 2.32.190.9. So traffic on my card started. THIS THEY CAN NOT HIDE in Cccam, it shows as a CONNECTED CLIENT from one of your clients in cccam.cfg where the dyndns has been removed (still lack of cccam, if dyndns is non-existing) the security feature doesn't work anymore and everybody can connect on that user.
                
                I have 2 words for UVADI TEAM -> YOU SUCK !!!!!!
                
                The future of CCcam is dead thanks to these low life asswipes , just after free sharing and making their own "spidernetwork" on your card.
                
                BLOCK ALL CLIENTS that have 2.3.0 connected to your server as it will still read all connected clients from the server, trough the client !!
                
                latest original CCcam 2.1.3 and 2.1.4 which are secure and don't have this backdoor code.
                Rule n.33 kid..... Concentrate

                Comment

                • vuplusuno
                  Newbie
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 3

                  #9
                  Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                  Originally posted by BlueIsMyColor
                  The great majority of the servers still using the 2.0.11 version. I don´t know why but there must be some reasons.

                  regards
                  The CCcam 2.0.11 is the fastest one, and its possible to do the 256 trick!

                  Comment

                  • aplok
                    Experienced Board Member
                    • Jun 2013
                    • 1155

                    #10
                    Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                    Originally posted by vuplusuno
                    The CCcam 2.0.11 is the fastest one, and its possible to do the 256 trick!
                    hi,

                    what do you mean by the 256 trick ?

                    thx

                    Comment

                    • kalpikos
                      Experienced Board Member
                      • Sep 2011
                      • 7663

                      #11
                      Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                      Originally posted by aplok
                      hi,

                      what do you mean by the 256 trick ?

                      thx
                      it's an old trick that you can add the number 256 to the end of N line and reshare a card as local many hops down.
                      If You Like My Post..... Please Press the Thanks Button

                      Comment

                      • aplok
                        Experienced Board Member
                        • Jun 2013
                        • 1155

                        #12
                        Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                        Originally posted by kalpikos
                        ... and reshare a card as local many hops down.
                        ... a trick or an illusion ? :

                        even if the hop counter is reset to 0,

                        this does not stop the ecm time response ... and further freezing ...

                        Comment

                        • BlueIsMyColor
                          Experienced Member
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 363

                          #13
                          Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                          Originally posted by kalpikos
                          it's an old trick that you can add the number 256 to the end of N line and reshare a card as local many hops down.
                          So it's a way to fool the others?! But i don't think that's the only reason. There must be positive things to use one oldest version.

                          regards

                          Comment

                          • gauloises1
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2012
                            • 148

                            #14
                            Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                            the reason is to "connect" your oscam READER to cccam SERVER
                            ex:mycard is readed by oscam but i use cccam for server and clients ....
                            "trick" is used for this kind of things
                            you can use this trick to 2.011,2.13 and 2.14
                            2.011 is usually a oscam-cccam config(you can change this version in 2.13,2.14.....in oscam-configuration-cccam)

                            Comment

                            • digicon
                              Experienced Board Member
                              • Jun 2011
                              • 971

                              #15
                              Re: Differences between cccam-versions as server?

                              The 256 trick will not work on any version of CCCam over 2.1.3

                              Comment

                              Working...