cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

[aplok]

hello guys !

i compare cpu and mem % for cccam 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0
monitored by top

here are the results


PID %CPU %MEM COMMAND
1520 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1521 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1521 0.1 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1522 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1529 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1530 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1531 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1532 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1533 0.0 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1534 0.1 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1534 0.3 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10
1534 0.9 6.6 CCcam_2.0.10

1722 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1723 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1724 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1731 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1732 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1733 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1733 0.3 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1734 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1734 0.1 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1734 0.7 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1735 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1736 0.0 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1736 0.9 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11
1736 1.1 6.5 CCcam_2.0.11


1809 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1809 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1809 2.1 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1810 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1810 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1810 1.1 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1811 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1811 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1811 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1812 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1812 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1812 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1813 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1813 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1813 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1814 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1814 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1814 2.3 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1820 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1820 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1820 0.1 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1820 2.7 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1821 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1821 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1821 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4
1822 0.8 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1822 0.9 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1822 1.1 6.9 CCcam_2.1.4
1822 0.9 7.0 CCcam_2.1.4

1898 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1898 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1898 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1899 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1899 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1899 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1900 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1900 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1900 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1901 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1901 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1901 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1902 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1902 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1902 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1903 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1903 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1903 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1903 0.7 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1904 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1904 0.3 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1904 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1904 1.7 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1905 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1905 0.0 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1905 0.0 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1906 1.8 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1906 0.7 6.9 CCcam_2.2.1
1906 0.3 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1
1906 0.5 7.0 CCcam_2.2.1

2006 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2007 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2007 0.1 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2008 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2009 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2010 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2011 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2012 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2013 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2013 0.1 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0
2014 0.0 7.2 CCcam_2.3.0

[sjamesamuel]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

Good idea!
An average for each would be more useful.

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

What machine have you used and what OS?

regards

[SatWaveDude]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

What machine have you used and what OS?

regards

Yes, this question would be interesting.
Can you please give more information and the average results?

Thanks in advance.

Very good idea to do this

[kalpikos]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

Hi mate

What exactly can I read in these results?
What is meaning of the cpu and mem % comparing them?

I think that comparing the abilities of each cam would be a more good idea.

[gianni253]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

I can't see meaningful differences.
I never cared about ccc*am's cpu and memory usage and didn't choose my favourite release basing on these parameters.

[sjamesamuel]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

I guess you made the test with exactly the same conditions, same channel ...
Also averaging over a number of encryption systems will be better.

[Satphoenix]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

The results are a bit strange to read:

PID - %CPU - %MEM - COMMAND
1723 - 0.0 - 6.5 - CCcam_2.0.11

???????

Perhaps you should explain (in concret example) what you did and what this result means.

[sjamesamuel]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

The results are a bit strange to read:

PID - %CPU - %MEM - COMMAND
1723 - 0.0 - 6.5 - CCcam_2.0.11

???????

Perhaps you should explain (in concret example) what you did and what this result means.

I think it's simple enough:
PID is the process id, which doesn't matter here.
cpu% is processor utilization of the process
mem% is memory allocated for the process

[Satphoenix]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

...
cpu% is processor utilization of the process
mem% is memory allocated for the process

...which means then 2.011 has the best result (in average)?!

[sjamesamuel]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

...which means then 2.011 has the best result (in average)?!

Not necessarily.
I think that other parameters should be taken in consideration, like average ecm time.
Also different encryption types should be checked.

Averaging can be easily done in excel.
The data can be just pasted into an excel sheet and then the averages can be easily calculated.

[gianni253]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

...which means then 2.011 has the best result (in average)?!

I wouldn't be surprised if 2.0.11 has the best result, also concerning memory and cpu usage ...

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

I can't see great differences between then. Is there other parameters to compare?

regards

[Satphoenix]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

...
I think that other parameters should be taken in consideration, like average ecm time...

But average ecm-times does depend on the server, not on the client-cccam.

[sjamesamuel]

Re: cccam contest: 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.1.4, 2.2.1 and 2.3.0

But average ecm-times does depend on the server, not on the client-cccam.

I think it depends on both. Some versions are faster than others.
If it is tested on the same server, the results should depend on the cccam client only.
Also averaging on all encryption types is useful.