Box with cccam webinterface

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

Dreambox is too expensive for what they do. Vu+ Uno or Solo2 are excellent options with a great support (images, drivers updates...).

Gigablue Quad have a long way to go: the drivers are not optimized yet and the picture quality has to be improved. Regards

[luk4asz]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

Tuners supported by OpenPli are those which you looking for.

_http://openpli.org/
_http://openpli.org/wiki/HomePage

[Satphoenix]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

...Gigablue Quad have a long way to go: the drivers are not optimized yet and the picture quality has to be improved. Regards

I've read the same in different sources (e.g. amazon comments).
So it will be a vu+.
And it surely has the cccam webinterface?!

@luk4asz: The ferguson is a pure client for a second room. It's a low cost receiver as pure client with many functions but without the webinterface. So no chance to check what is possibly wrong with clines, servers...
For me in the (main) living-room the webinterface is very important!

[gianni253]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

Gigablue Quad have a long way to go: the drivers are not optimized yet and the picture quality has to be improved. Regards

I can bet that german developers will fill the gap very soon, but there comes another issue about support and teams ... language !
Are you familiar with german language ?
I've found that main forums of brands such as Gigablue or vu+ are german and, though you may find also english sections, the most of threads are in german language

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

I can bet that german developers will fill the gap very soon, but there comes another issue about support and teams ... language !
Are you familiar with german language ?
I've found that main forums of brands such as Gigablue or vu+ are german and, though you may find also english sections, the most of threads are in german language

English is an universal language so that's not the problem. Both (Gigablue and Vu+) have good support (forums and so on).

If you buy a box with enigma2 and with good support your "problem" is solved.

Regards

[Satphoenix]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

Are you familiar with german language ?

Yes.


OK, a little joke...
But there are many sources and english speaking wikis for the new generation of receivers in the net.
E.g. as I've seen here, there are many receivers with the webinterface and my questions especially here on this board are qualified answered.
So now I think about a vu+ solo2 twin. I believe it has all the things I expect from a modern sat-receiver (incl. webinterface).

[Triad]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

It's not enough to have just wikis or some official website supporting some new receiver. It's to user bases and network of forums where continuing feedbacks are circulating and only in this way quality interface can be developed, emulation, plugin or any good e2 image... ;-)

[gianni253]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

It's not enough to have just wikis or some official website supporting some new receiver. It's to user bases and network of forums where continuing feedbacks are circulating and only in this way quality interface can be developed, emulation, plugin or any good e2 image... ;-)

I fully agree mate, and when these forums tend to use a national language because receiver is more widespread in their countries, it can be a problem for other international (english speaking) users.

[bokkie]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

I'd say other than dmm, vu+, openbox, spiderbox, gigablue, etc. Support can be a bit thin on the ground in english language.
Best to stick with the more popular receivers.

[aplok]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

Just look for any receiver with enigma2 support.
If you have enigma2 you can install any emu/card server (ccc*am, mgca*md, osc*am, unic*am, etc. etc.) you like

is it true for an enigma 1 rcvr ?

i am thinking about a cheap second hand dreambox dm 500 ( 50 € ), with enigma e1

compared with a

Ferguson Ariva 102E digitaler Satelliten Receiver Full HD ( 70 € )

[BlueIsMyColor]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

is it true for an enigma 1 rcvr ?

i am thinking about a cheap second hand dreambox dm 500 ( 50 € ), with enigma e1

compared with a

Ferguson Ariva 102E digitaler Satelliten Receiver Full HD ( 70 € )

if you can buy an dreambox 500s in second hand it's a good investment but cannot handle hd channels.

regards

[gianni253]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

is it true for an enigma 1 rcvr ?

i am thinking about a cheap second hand dreambox dm 500 ( 50 € ), with enigma e1

compared with a

Ferguson Ariva 102E digitaler Satelliten Receiver Full HD ( 70 € )

Yes, it's true with exception of unic*am, that is compatible only with e2 receivers.
But you lose HD, of course ...

[Satphoenix]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

...compared with a

Ferguson Ariva 102E digitaler Satelliten Receiver Full HD ( 70 € )

The big disadvantage of the ferguson is the missing cccam-webinterface. That's the reason why I started this topic.
I've tested a few hours with this receiver untill I found my ways to use.
You have to go an indirect way to get ccam informations because it's a closed system.
But with the "correct setup" it's a good hd-receiver which I prefer before any non-hd box (now).

(Edit: But I'm still looking for the optimal video settings for the sd channels.)

[aplok]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

(Edit: But I'm still looking for the optimal video settings for the sd channels.)

just a question ( i am still a newbee with numeric sat rcvr ... ), and i don't known about ferguson ariva102e

does the ferguson ariva102e have services like:
- http server
- ftp server
- some ram space available when usual plugins are loaded
- telnet server

( - is it linux driven ? -)

is it only with ariva102a, or the same service layout for all ferguson rvcr ?

thx

[filicart]

Re: Box with cccam webinterface

doesn't have ftp, telnet. There are emu and settings, but all very limited