Re: Best receiver
well it looks like it might well have to be a vu+ for me then will have to start saving the pennies.
Alert: Don't Use Hotmail Email Accounts for registration
Collapse
Before Access to all Forums and Trial accounts you must need to activate your account Email address
Best receiver
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Best receiver
Originally posted by msaeedppbokkie u r right it has slow bcm processor but its quality is that it is origional and cheap
i'm really tempted to get a vu+ ultimo with the prices dropping so much in the past few months.
Reckon I'll wait to see what happens with the vu+ solo2 and duo2 when they come out.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
DREAMBOX 800 HD (M-TUNER) ,,, VU DUO OR VU SOLO ARE THE BEST STBsLeave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
I`m get-in a vu+ uno.. thanxsatlovers for the info......Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
Sorry, don't know much about the azbox. But as far as support goes, vu+ and dreambox are probably the best supported. This has proved invaluable to me in getting my vu+ duo up and running.
Not only that, i reckon they probably have the widest choice of plugins, etc as well.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
I must admit i have heard good things about the vu+ solo and nothing about the GiGaBlue but i am also hearing good things about the azbox elite. does anyone know anything about this box?Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
Only problem I've heard of with gigablue is the very slow BCM chipset and processor. It takes over 2 minutes to boot from deep standby.
I'd go with a vu+ solo (£180), vu+ uno (£240) or the dm 800se (£160).
My personal preference would be the uno as it's really well specced and has the option of making it into a twin tuner.
Just stay away from vu+ clones as they are having problems with the psu.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
For a budget open source linux receivers Giga Blue HD and Amiko Aliens are also good options. You get everything in these receivers offered by a dreambox. They are origional and cheap.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
If you don't require twin tuners then a vu+ solo, vu+ uno, or a dm 800se would be the way to go.
There might be a plugin that allows you to stream from pc to stb, I'm just not sure.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
Clones wont be a good idea as already has discussed in another thread. The best to buy an original. But it from Europe and a Vu+ Duo would cost about £230 with the recent exchange rate.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
No i don't require a twin tuner as all my recording will be done via my sky hd, just want it for other satellites and ideally streaming. You would have thought as you can get media players that stream files directly from a pc via ethernet that it wouldn't be too difficult to build a sat box that is capable of doing it as most of them can play these files via usb connectionLeave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
Also consider that vu+ are releasing the twin tuner module soon which would make an uno a twin tuner. This would be a great option in my opinion as the uno is better specced and better looking than the duo.
Do you require a twin tuner?Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
I doubt they'll get much cheaper to start with, maybe middle of next year we'll see prices start to go down, but immediately i dont think so.
Have a look at a dm800se clone, if you want dual tuner then look at a vu+ duo (or the clone, which costs about £200).Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
bokkie is spot on. Vu+ or dreams are the most popular and much supported boxes. I would suggest to wait til December when the Vu+Solo2 and Duo2 are out. They might be very pricy and in the beginning they wont have much support available online. But the rest of that family might get cheaper.
Tip: Always buy a receiver for which you can get help and support easily.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Best receiver
Dream box or vu+ are probably regarded as the best out there.
so you want to stream from your pc to your stb? Not sure about that one.
But as for all the other requirements, these 2 receivers can meet them.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: